Login >Join Now Print  Email to a Friend  Newsletters

 

Connecticut Health Freedom
Coalition

 

HomeHomeAbout UsContact UsRallies & EventsRallies & EventsRally DetailsTerms of UsePrivacyNewslettersNewslettersNews & ViewsAHHF on CTHFCAAHF 05307SearchSite TreeContributeContributeHealthcare ForumContribute ContentsThe Issues1 ] Who Should Choose For You?2 ] Why Do Consumers Choose Natural Therapies?3 ] Who Provides These Therapies?4 ] Are You Free To Choose?5 ] Does It Pay To Be Different?6 ] Consumers Should Have The Freedom To...7 ] Practitioners Should Have The Right To...8 ] New Laws Are Essential To...9 ] What Can I Do?LibraryLibrarySearch LibraryResourcesHealthcare Freedom WebsitesIntegrative Medical AssociationsLegal & Advocacy ResourcesBook ListMembers & ArticlesMembersJoin Now
1 ] Who Should Choose For You?
2 ] Why Do Consumers Choose Natural Therapies?
3 ] Who Provides These Therapies?
4 ] Are You Free To Choose?
5 ] Does It Pay To Be Different?
6 ] Consumers Should Have The Freedom To...
7 ] Practitioners Should Have The Right To...
8 ] New Laws Are Essential To...
9 ] What Can I Do?
LibraryLibrarySearch Library

Content Detail

020 -- National Politics & Health Freedom

Dr. Paul’s Writings › Free Market Medicine 

Ron Paul 2008 > http://www.ronpaul2008.com/articles/54/free-market-medicine/

Summary:

Last week the congressional Joint Economic committee on which I serve held a hearing featuring two courageous medical doctors. I had the pleasure of meeting with one of the witnesses, Dr. Robert Berry, who opened a low-cost health clinic in rural Tennessee. His clinic does not accept insurance, Medicare, or Medicaid, which allows Dr. Berry to treat patients without interference from third-party government bureaucrats or HMO administrators. In other words, Dr. Berry practices medicine as most doctors did 40 years ago, when patients paid cash for ordinary services and had inexpensive catastrophic insurance for serious injuries or illnesses. As a result, Dr. Berry and his patients decide for themselves what treatment is appropriate.


Last week the congressional Joint Economic committee on which I serve held a hearing featuring two courageous medical doctors.  I had the pleasure of meeting with one of the witnesses, Dr. Robert Berry, who opened a low-cost health clinic in rural Tennessee.  His clinic does not accept insurance, Medicare, or Medicaid, which allows Dr. Berry to treat patients without interference from third-party government bureaucrats or HMO administrators.  In other words, Dr. Berry practices medicine as most doctors did 40 years ago, when patients paid cash for ordinary services and had inexpensive catastrophic insurance for serious injuries or illnesses.  As a result, Dr. Berry and his patients decide for themselves what treatment is appropriate. 

Freed from HMO and government bureaucracy, Dr. Berry can focus on medicine rather than billing.  Operating on a cash basis lowers his overhead considerably, allowing him to charge much lower prices than other doctors.  He often charges just $35 for routine maladies, which is not much more than one's insurance co-pay in other offices.  His affordable prices enable low-income patients to see him before minor problems become serious, and unlike most doctors, Dr. Berry sees patients the same day on a walk-in basis.  Yet beyond his low prices and quick appointments, Dr. Berry provides patients with excellent medical care.

While many liberals talk endlessly about medical care for the poor, Dr. Berry actually helps uninsured people every day.  His patients are largely low-income working people, who cannot afford health insurance but don't necessarily qualify for state assistance.  Some of his uninsured patients have been forced to visit hospital emergency rooms for non-emergency treatment because no doctor would see them.  Others disliked the long waits and inferior treatment they endured at government clinics.  For many of his patients, Dr. Berry's clinic has been a godsend. 

Dr. Berry's experience illustrates the benefits of eliminating the middleman in health care.  For decades, the U.S. healthcare system was the envy of the entire world.  Not coincidentally, there was far less government involvement in medicine during this time.  America had the finest doctors and hospitals, patients enjoyed high quality, affordable medical care, and thousands of private charities provided health services for the poor. Doctors focused on treating patients, without the red tape and threat of lawsuits that plague the profession today. Most Americans paid cash for basic services, and had insurance only for major illnesses and accidents. This meant both doctors and patients had an incentive to keep costs down, as the patient was directly responsible for payment, rather than an HMO or government program.

We should remember that HMOs did not arise because of free-market demand, but rather because of government mandates.  The HMO Act of 1973 requires all but the smallest employers to offer their employees HMO coverage, and the tax code allows businesses- but not individuals- to deduct the cost of health insurance premiums.  The result is the illogical coupling of employment and health insurance, which often leaves the unemployed without needed catastrophic coverage.

While many in Congress are happy to criticize HMOs today, the public never hears how the present system was imposed upon the American people by federal law. In fact, one very prominent Senator now attacking HMOs is on record in the 1970s lauding them.  As usual, government intervention in the private market failed to deliver the promised benefits and caused unintended consequences, but Congress never blames itself for the problems created by bad laws.  Instead, we are told more government- in the form of "universal coverage"- is the answer.

We can hardly expect more government to cure our current health care woes. As with all goods and services, medical care is best delivered by the free market, with competition and financial incentives keeping costs down. When patients spend their own money for health care, they have a direct incentive to negotiate lower costs with their doctor. When government controls health care, all cost incentives are lost.  Dr. Berry and others like him may one day be seen as consumer heroes who challenged the third-party health care system and resisted the trend toward socialized medicine in America.

 

Library | Search Library

Go backTOPGo forward


Contribute to the Connecticut Heath Freedom Coalition
 


Terms of Use  -  Privacy Statement 

Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.
The articles posted on this website are the opinions of the authors who submitted them, not necessarily those of
Connecticut Health Freedom Coalition, Inc. Information is provided from a variety of sources that are solely responsible for content.

The information contained on this site is general in nature and is intended for use as an informational aid.
This information is not intended as medical advice or diagnosis for individual health problems
or for making an evaluation as to the risks and benefits of using a particular product.
You should consult your doctor about diagnosis and treatment of any health problems.
Information and statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration
("FDA"), nor has the FDA approved the products to diagnose, cure or prevent disease.
 Connecticut Health Freedom Coalition, Inc. shall not be held responsible for content herein.
Copyright 2006, 2007 Connecticut Health Freedom Coalition, Inc.. All rights reserved.